Trained Fruit Shapes

Introduction

This general article describes which forms there are [^1] for trained fruit trees [^2].

In total, descriptions of more than 100 espalier shapes are included, but this list does not claim to be exhaustive.

Insight into the variation in espalier shapes offers support to those who want to grow espalier fruit trees themselves .For example, pear or apple.

[mks_icon icon=”fa-lightbulb-o” color=”#0000ff” type=”fa”] For customized advice or coaching contact me

[^1]: Synonyms: fruit espalier shapes, shapes guided fruit trees.
[^2]: Synonyms: guided fruit tree, fruit espalier tree, fruit shaped tree, shaped fruit tree.

Classification of Trained Fruit

Numerous espalier forms have been described separately in the literature.
This website is the first to present a classification that provides insight into their similarities and differences.

Creating a classification for “(espalier) forms” is less simple than it seems, for the following reasons:

  • espalier forms are composed of forms that are not (mathematical) basic forms
  • each espalier form has subvariants
  • descriptive names quickly become (too) long

An attempt has been made to arrive at a classification of espalier forms that works easily and intuitively. This means, among other things:

  • names have been modernized (adapted to the current zeitgeist)
    Older names and synonyms are listed separately.
  • short names for espalier forms
    The aim has been to create names with few syllables.
    New terms have also been introduced, such as: “U Palmet” and Diptych / Triptych.
  • names with few hyphens
  • names that are easy to translate into English and French
  • arrangement in a way that provides insight into the evolution of espalier forms
  • prefixes (such as: “1-side“) and suffixes (such as: “side-to-side“) are shown in small letters, so that the main type can be recognized at a glance.
  • per category one slate form has been elevated to basic form
  • clear illustrations

At the bottom of this page is an explanation of the Dutch language use.

Your feedback, experiences and photos are always welcome!

Main types

Single Cord

Standard form with 1 frame branch​

Double Cord

Standard form with 2 framework branches

Trident

Espalier with 3 parallel branches

Palmetto

Espalier with 4 or more parallel branches

Fan

Espalier with fan-shaped frame branches

3D Shape

Espalier with frame branches in 3 dimensions

In Combination: Diptych / Twins

Fixed combination of 2 fruit trees in mirror image

In Combination: Triptych

Fixed combination of 3 fruit trees

In Combination: Series / Pattern

Series of fruit trees of the same type

Contact Me

Dutch Language Use Accountability

Use of noun "Palmet"

According to the Green Booklet, the noun “palmet” has two genders:

  • masculine (“the palmet”)
  • feminine (“the palmet”)

There is a slight difference in meaning between the two word variants.
This website prefers:

  • the feminine form (“the Palmet”) as a type designation,
    from a theoretical/scientific perspective
  • the masculine form (“the palmet”) where it concerns an individual tree, for practical situations

This means that you will encounter both variants interchangeably in texts.
Two comments on this:

  • The distinction, as indicated above, will not always be applied consistently.
  • The plural form begins by definition with the masculine article (the palmettes).

One of the considerations for preferably using the feminine term (“the”) or neuter term (“a”) in descriptions of types of espalier forms is that this produces fewer syllables, and therefore a simpler word image. Example: “the ge-woon palmet” versus “the ge-wo-ne palmet”.

A simpler word image is easier to read and reduces language barriers.

Use of Hyphens

This website has a (very) restrictive policy regarding hyphens (“-“), even though this goes against the “correct” spelling according to the Green Booklet.

The reason for this (conscious) choice is that consistent and correct use of hyphens according to the Green Booklet would sometimes lead to an abundance of hyphens, which would reduce rather than increase the readability for the visitor.

Furthermore, the omission of hyphens can be justified to some extent by considering the terms in question as proper names.

In practice, this means that hyphens are usually omitted from frequently occurring terms (proper names), while they are used for rarely used terms

Examples:

  • “U shape” (without hyphen!)
    But:
  • “Spits-Eivormen Palmet” (with hyphen), as a counterpart to “Eivormen Palmet”.
error: Content is protected !!